Truth About IB 2

Upper St. Clair, Pa. is a southern suburb of Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. The School district has had a long tradition of academic excellence, however oversight by the School Board had been waning and  fiscal concerns rising due to Board and administrative complacency. The township was dominated by Republican candidates who lost focus due to lack of political competition and the consolidation of power among a few elite. The Republican committee, headed by an attorney, had long been a determining body of politics, however candidates emerged who did not receive endorsement from him. Although his committee saw great promise in a return to traditional conservative principles and endorsed candidates who fit those characteristics, he resisted the vast majority of his fellow committee members. When his committee voted against his recommendation overwhelmingly, he resigned unexpectedly during the annual Republican dinner shocking his colleagues. Many felt he resigned in disgrace and that his resignation was little more than a political tantrum.

The conservative candidates began to win elected office and in 2005 gained majority control of the School District vowing to restore accountability in academics and fiscal restraint. During the campaign, a candidate was asked a question about the International Baccalaureate program and its role in the USC educational plan. He stated that he knew little of the program but he believed that whatever we taught our children should be in keeping with the traditional Christian values on which our Country was founded. Unbelievably, this tiny phrase created a fire storm of retaliation from IB supporters who viewed the statement as offensive and a direct attack on IB. This very reaction made many wonder what the true intent of the program was and why these people would find offensive traditional American principles. A few students and parents protested at the polls and an IB administrator participated in the political events using school materials and property to facilitate a political outcome in violation of established school policy. The Administrator, who had written a doctoral thesis on IB facilitated by the District; and who was scolded for a lackluster and inadequate review of the Middle Years Program two years prior, was disciplined by the superintendent without Board intervention. His review contained no critical data and lacked substance, but was filled with platitudes and insubstantial backfill.

A scheduled review of the Diploma program was delayed a number of times by a former superintendent . The reasons for the delay were not made clear, but the board respectfully awaited the review.

In the mean time, the election noted above occurred and the newly seated Board was told the review would soon be presented. Interestingly, the person who was the target of the IB activists, amassed the largest vote total. Members of the board who had been through the previous review did not want another non-substantive review session touting the established programs without hard data. Very specific evaluative data were requested including comparative test scores of IB and non-IB students (including comparisons with the well established AP program), metrics related to post-graduation performance in Colleges, scheduling irregularities, a listing of the substantive differences in curriculum, and actual costs. The Administration gave only a partial cost analysis, a brochure from the AP, and a question and answer type document which was later found to be plagiarized from a document created to answer similar questions which arose during an IB controversy in Minnetonka, Minnesota (These documents are both available on this website for your review and comparison). Additionally, Board members conducted independent research suspecting a "Dog and Pony  show" as had been delivered earlier. The administrative review was little more than a cheer leading session and when hard questions were asked, the administrator  who had chaired the review could not answer substantively. When it was shown to him that his committee had promoted the Minnetonka documents as unique to Upper St. Clair, he admitted his deception. He denied that any evaluative data were available. Proving that the program did not distinguish itself after the failed presentation, the program was cancelled.

Following a frivolous and malicious ACLU lawsuit which cost the taxpayers 300,000 dollars and was projected to cost more than 750,000 dollars, the fiscally conservative board relented and reinstated the program. No wrong doing was ever found, however Board members and their children faced death threats, physical assault, verbal and physical harassment, and property damage. Board meetings became so unruly that a full time Police Officer was called in to ensure the safety of the public and the Board members. A highly respected local civic leader even wrote an essay on the subject called "Legal Terrorism". Contact with an IBO school in Europe by Board Members confirmed that the IBO did send feedback data from every student exam and also evaluated the in-house teachers,comparing their grading to the international scorers. Later, the administrator  finally confessed that he, in fact, did receive feedback and evaluative data from the IBO stating that he did not think the Board should have them.  These data have never been released to the School Board.

The community of Upper St. Clair has not recovered from the fallout of the ACLU lawsuit. In fact, the IBO has been emboldened by the lawsuit. A recent review of the Primary Years Program done by IBO states that the USC program is inadequately delivered and the IBO further demands that the entire school be forced into the IB program or the program cancelled.   It is feared that the IBO will demand this of all schools in the District and that parents will lose local control of their School District. The neighborhood public schools will be lost to the international body. Meanwhile, the liberal fringe was restored to power after a nasty record-breaking 40,000 dollar campaign, proving that political motivation was the impetus for the discord all along.